![sql prompt license cost sql prompt license cost](https://static.vecteezy.com/system/resources/thumbnails/004/422/390/small/wildlife-protection-linear-icon-act-punishment-or-no-license-hunting-fee-provision-offence-thin-line-customizable-illustration-contour-symbol-isolated-outline-drawing-editable-stroke-vector.jpg)
More CALs than 30 if you have two (or three, or ten. Since these licenses are assigned to the accessing device or user, and not to the SQL Server itself, you don't need any If i go with Per Device/user License, Whether I need to buy 2 SQL Licenses for these 2 servers or one license To license all cores in the physical server with the most cores.ģ. If you license per core, and the two physical servers have different numbers of cores, the number of core licenses must be enough As long as the second server meets the definition of a passive failover server it does not need to be licensed separately. The Open price list when they were available.Ģa. Just for reference, if you could purchase SQL 2008 processor licenses, you would need two of them and they would have cost $17,210 on If you went per core, you would need to purchase eight core licenses, which would cost $14,344. SQL Server is now licensed per core rather than per processor You could use SQL 2008 if you have the software, but you would license it with SQL Server 2012 licenses. SQL Server is no longer sold per-processor, and SQL 2008 licenses are no longer available. If you go with SQL Server Standard licensed for CAL access, the license would cost $898 and 30 CALs cost $6,270, for a total of $7,168, using the Open price list.Ģ. In general, these days I recommend user CALs unless you have a scenario where device CALs are clearly less expensive. 16 cores still will cost you over 100K, minus any discounts you might get after talking to. If they are accessing the SQL Server from a specific set of workstations, it might be less expensive to license the workstations with Device CALs. a license's which covers two cores is 14,256, which is 7,128 per core, as I stated originally.
![sql prompt license cost sql prompt license cost](https://img.informer.com/p7/sql-prompt-v7-setup-window.png)
They can then access the server from any device.
#SQL PROMPT LICENSE COST PORTABLE#
If your users might be accessing SQL Server from more than one device (e.g., from a workstation at work, and a home computer or portable when they're not at work) you would license the users. Microsoft does not license SQL Server for concurrent users so you need CALs for the maximum number of users or devices that access the server. Licenses are no longer available for SQL Server, which is now sold per-core. When you are licensing SQL per user or per device that accesses the server, you need to purchase Client Access Licenses (CALs) for each user or device, and I would recommend this approach in your scenario. Which licensing is recommended and why? Per Processor or Per User or per device?